Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale SAS

Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale SAS overview

Creator and Context

The Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) is a 20 item self report measure of anxiety, published by William Zung in 1971 as the companion to his depression scale.

Like the SDS, it uses two different scores: a raw score and a converted index score. Confusing the two is the single most common error made with this instrument.

Presenting Conditions

The 20 items cover affective and somatic symptoms of anxiety, with the content weighted heavily towards the somatic. Some items are positively worded and reverse scored.

There are no formal subscales.

Administration

Self administered in about five minutes. Each item is rated from None, or a little of the time (1) to Most, or all of the time (4), in relation to the past several days.

Desired Audience

Adults, for screening anxiety symptoms and grading their severity.

Pratical Application

Practical Application

The Zung SAS pairs directly with the SDS, on the same scoring logic and the same response format. For services running both, that consistency has practical value, and there is a long comparative literature behind both.

Considerations

  • The raw versus index confusion is the defining hazard. A review found that up to 45 percent of papers using an SAS cut off had incorrectly applied index criteria to raw scores. Applying the index bands to a raw score materially under identifies cases.

  • The item content is heavily somatic, which risks false positives in medically ill populations.

  • The 1971 norms are dated, and in most modern practice the SAS has been superseded by measures such as the GAD-7 and the DASS.

  • Copyright status is not clearly documented. Confirm before commercial deployment.

  • It is a screening instrument, not a diagnosis.

How to score the Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale SAS

Conducting the assessment

The person rates 20 items from 1 to 4 for the past several days. Positively worded items are reverse scored.

Interpretation

Items are summed to give a raw score from 20 to 80, which is converted to an index score by multiplying by 1.25, giving a range of 25 to 100.

The severity bands apply to the index score:

  • Below 45 normal

  • 45 to 59 mild to moderate anxiety

  • 60 to 74 marked to severe

  • 75 to 100 extreme

An index of 45 corresponds to a raw score of 36. Contemporary evidence (Dunstan and Scott, 2020) suggests a raw score of 36 may be appropriate for clinical screening, while the original raw cut off of 40 is more appropriate for research use.

Clinical Considerations

  • Be explicit about whether you are displaying a raw or an index score. This is the error to design out.

  • Consider the physical health picture. The somatic loading will over identify anxiety in medically unwell people.

  • Where a contemporary measure is acceptable, the GAD-7 is a simpler and better validated option.

Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale SAS use cases

  • Screening for anxiety symptoms in adults

  • Grading anxiety severity

  • Use alongside the Zung SDS where consistency across the pair is wanted

  • Research

Category

Anxiety

Research Summary

  • Zung, W. W. K. (1971). A rating instrument for anxiety disorders. Psychosomatics, 12(6), 371 to 379.

  • Dunstan, D. A., & Scott, N. (2020). Norms for Zung's Self-rating Anxiety Scale. BMC Psychiatry, 20, 90.

  • Dunstan, D. A., Scott, N., & Todd, A. K. (2017). Screening for anxiety and depression: Reassessing the utility of the Zung scales. BMC Psychiatry, 17, 329.

Other Assessment Guides

Other Assessment Guides

Note on Assessment licensing
Some assessments are copyright protected and require a licence or the copyright holder's permission for clinical, commercial or digital use. Where that applies, obtaining and maintaining that permission is the responsibility of the practice or organisation using the assessment. Tacklit provides the digital administration, scoring and reporting. We do not grant, transfer or supply rights to the underlying instrument.

Get in touch with our friendly team today.

See what Tacklit could look like for you and your team.

Get in touch with our friendly team today.

See what Tacklit could look like for you and your team.

Get in touch with our friendly team today.

See what Tacklit could look like for you and your team.

St Kilda, Melbourne

We acknowledge the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the first inhabitants of this nation and the traditional custodians of the lands where we live, learn and work.

City Road, London

Ecocity, Kuala Lumpur

TACKLIT © All Rights Reserved, 2026.

St Kilda, Melbourne

We acknowledge the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the first inhabitants of this nation and the traditional custodians of the lands where we live, learn and work.

City Road, London

Ecocity, Kuala Lumpur

TACKLIT © All Rights Reserved, 2026.

St Kilda, Melbourne

We acknowledge the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the first inhabitants of this nation and the traditional custodians of the lands where we live, learn and work.

City Road, London

Ecocity, Kuala Lumpur

TACKLIT © All Rights Reserved, 2026.

St Kilda, Melbourne

We acknowledge the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the first inhabitants of this nation and the traditional custodians of the lands where we live, learn and work.

City Road, London

Ecocity, Kuala Lumpur

TACKLIT © All Rights Reserved, 2026.